Your Finance GuideAustralian finance educationGet matched
Mortgage brokers

Mortgage broker or bank?

A bank shows you its own loans; a broker shows you a panel of lenders and is legally bound to act in your best interests, at no cost to you. That is the whole case in one sentence, and it is why brokers now write about four in five Australian home loans. It is not the whole story: there are cases where the bank wins, and downsides on both sides. This guide puts the two routes side by side on what actually differs and tells you when each is the right call.

A couple weighing up home loan options.
23 lenders vs 1
The average broker is accredited with 23 lenders and presents three options (MFAA).
Written by Sarah ChenReviewed by James Mitchell, Editor-in-ChiefLast reviewed Published
Broker vs bank at a glance
  • Choice: a bank assesses you against its own products and policy; a broker compares a panel, on average 23 lenders and three presented options (MFAA)
  • Duty: brokers must act in your best interests and put your interests first in a conflict; bank staff carry no such duty (MFAA, National Credit Act)
  • Cost: the loan terms are identical either way; the lender pays the broker, and the ACCC found broker customers generally get equal or better pricing
  • The bank wins when it will match the market for a simple profile, when you want a direct-only product, or when you value one relationship over choice
  • The broker wins on non-standard income, small deposits, credit blemishes, discretionary pricing and repricing later (MFAA: average 0.35% cut on repricing)

WARNING: This comparison rate is true only for the example given and may not include all fees and charges. Different terms, fees, or other loan amounts might result in a different comparison rate. Comparison rates are based on a secured loan of $30,000 over 5 years for vehicle finance and $50,000 over 5 years for equipment finance, as required under the National Credit Code.

What is actually different?

Not the loan. The product, rate card and fees a lender offers through a broker are the ones it offers in the branch, and the lender pays the broker out of its own margin, so the price you pay is the same or, per the ACCC's home loan price inquiry, slightly better through a broker. What differs is who does the comparing, under what duty, and how many lenders are in the frame.

What differsBank (direct)Mortgage broker
Lenders consideredOne: its own products under its own credit policyA panel; the MFAA reports an average of 23 lender accreditations and three options presented
Legal duty to youNone beyond responsible lending; bank staff are not bound by the best interests duty (MFAA)Best interests duty and conflict priority rule since 1 January 2021 (National Credit Act, ASIC RG 273)
Cost to youNothing, beyond the loan's own feesNothing in most cases; the lender pays upfront and trail commission; any fee to you must be disclosed and agreed in writing first (Moneysmart)
RateThe card rate plus whatever discretionary discount you negotiate yourselfThe same card rates across the panel, plus pricing requests the broker lodges; MFAA reports a 0.35% average cut on broker repricing
Approval oddsOne policy; a decline means a fresh application and credit enquiry elsewhereLodged with the lender whose policy fits your income, deposit and security
SpeedDepends on the bank's queue; digital lenders can be fast for simple filesDepends on the chosen lender; the broker packages the file so it is assessed once
Ongoing serviceWhatever the bank offers; repricing is on you to requestTrail commission pays the broker to keep you; annual reviews and repricing are part of the model
Blind spotsEvery other lenderLenders not on the panel, including some direct-only lenders (Canstar)
Who is accountableThe bank, via its complaints process and AFCAThe broker's licensee, via its complaints process and AFCA (Moneysmart)

When the broker wins

  • Your income is not a payslip. Self-employed under two years, casual, contract, bonus-heavy or parental leave income is accepted by some lenders and not others, and a broker knows which. The self-employed and casual income guides show how far policies differ.
  • Your deposit is small or your credit file is not clean. Lenders' appetite for 5% deposits, scheme places, guarantors and past defaults varies; one decline at your own bank costs a credit enquiry.
  • You want the discretionary discount. Lenders hold pricing below the card rate for requests, and brokers lodge those requests daily.
  • You want someone paid to keep the loan competitive. Trail commission is the incentive; the MFAA's 0.35% average repricing cut is the result.
  • You want a legal duty on your side. Only the broker has one.

When the bank wins

  • It will match the market and you are simple. A salaried borrower with a 20% deposit and a standard house can get the bottom-of-market rate direct if the bank is prepared to match it, and then the broker adds convenience, not money.
  • The product is direct-only. A few lenders and some digital brands do not pay brokers and sit outside every panel; if one of them has the loan you want, apply yourself.
  • You value one relationship. Business owners with lending, transaction and merchant facilities at one bank sometimes get package pricing that a broker cannot replicate elsewhere.
  • You already know the loan you want. If you have done the comparison and the bank's offer is the winner, the broker's panel is not adding anything.

The downsides, honestly

A broker's panel is a boundary: Canstar notes brokers do not work with every lender, and the duty does not require a broker to consider lenders they cannot lodge with, only to document why the panel options they chose serve you best. Brokers are paid on settlement and lose the commission to clawback if you leave within about two years, which is a structural preference for loans that settle and stay, and the reason to ask how the recommendation was reached. And quality varies; the duty is a floor. A bank's downside is simpler: one lender, one policy, no duty, and the comparison work is yours. Moneysmart's checklist works for either route: confirm the licence, ask for more than one option, ask why each is in your best interests, and ask how the adviser is paid and whether it differs between lenders.

Where we fit

Your Finance Guide is neither. We publish the guides and calculators, and when you ask, we refer you to one licensed broker partner who is paid by the lender on the rates set out in the how brokers are paid guide and who pays us a referral fee out of that commission, disclosed in our credit guide. We do not lend, assess or recommend loans. If your own bank's offer is the best one, the broker partner is bound to say so.

Broker vs bank FAQs

Is it better to deal with a mortgage broker or a bank?
For most borrowers a broker, because one application reaches a panel of lenders instead of one, the broker is legally bound to act in your best interests and a bank lender is not, and the service costs you nothing because the lender pays the commission. The MFAA reports brokers are accredited with an average of 23 lenders and present an average of three options. A bank wins in narrower cases: you have a strong existing relationship with pricing to match, you want a product only that bank offers direct, or your situation is so plain that the branch rate is already the best available and you value the single point of contact.
What are the disadvantages of using a mortgage broker?
Three. A broker can only recommend lenders on their panel, and Canstar notes brokers do not work with every lender on the market, so a direct-only lender is out of reach unless you apply yourself. A broker is paid on settlement, with clawback if you leave within two years, so despite the duty there is a structural preference for loans that settle and stay. And quality varies: the duty sets a floor, not a ceiling, and Moneysmart’s advice to check the licence and ask why each loan is in your best interests exists for a reason.
What are the disadvantages of going direct to a bank?
You see one lender’s products, assessed under one credit policy, by staff who owe you no best interests duty; the MFAA factsheet and the MFAA’s duty page both make the point that the duty binds brokers and not bank staff. If that bank declines you or prices you badly, you start again elsewhere with another credit enquiry. And you carry the comparison work yourself: comparison rates, fees, features and the lender’s appetite for your income type.
Are mortgage brokers cheaper than banks?
The loan costs the same either way, because the lender pays the broker out of its margin and a broker customer gets the same product terms as a direct customer; the ACCC’s home loan price inquiry found broker customers generally receive equal or better pricing. Where a broker can be cheaper is in getting a lender’s discretionary discount, in placing you with a lender whose pricing for your profile is lower than your own bank’s, and in repricing later: the MFAA reports customers repriced through a broker achieved an average rate cut of 0.35%.
Is it easier to get a home loan through a broker?
Usually, for anyone outside the plainest profile. A broker knows which lenders accept casual income, self-employed income under two years, small deposits, credit blemishes or unusual security, and lodges with the one most likely to approve rather than the one you happened to bank with. That avoids a decline and the credit enquiry that comes with it. For a salaried applicant with a 20% deposit buying a standard house, either route will approve.
Can a broker get you a better interest rate?
Often, but not by magic. Brokers have access to the same rate cards as the bank’s own staff; what they add is knowing which lender prices your loan size, LVR and purpose best on the day, asking for the discretionary discount lenders hold back for pricing requests, and repricing the loan later. The MFAA’s 0.35% average repricing reduction is the published figure. If your bank’s offer is already at the bottom of the market for your profile, a broker will tell you so.
Is a mortgage broker worth it?
For most borrowers yes, on the arithmetic: no cost to you, a legal duty on your side, more lenders in one application and a professional carrying the paperwork. It is least worth it when you have already found the cheapest suitable loan yourself, your bank is offering to match it, and your application is simple; then the broker adds convenience rather than money. Moneysmart’s test is the useful one: get the broker to show you more than one option and explain why each is in your best interests.
Can I use a broker and still get my own bank’s loan?
Yes, if your bank is on the broker’s panel, and the majors are on nearly every panel. Moneysmart notes you may prefer a particular lender such as your current bank and that the broker should show you loans from other lenders as well so you can compare. The loan you end up with is the same product at the same terms; the difference is that the broker lodged it, is paid by the bank for doing so, and owes you the duty the branch does not.
Free · No obligation · One match

Compare the panel, not one bank

One conversation with our licensed broker partner puts your own bank's offer up against the rest of the panel, with a legal duty to tell you which is better. Free for borrowers, no obligation.

★★★★★4.9 across 320+ broker-partner reviewsAustralian Credit Licence 505575Independent. Education first.
Get a free finance quote
60 secs · 50+ lenders · No fee
Start